One tournament. A world of memories.20 NOV — 18 DEC 2022 QATAR
Home / Articles / Articles
Articles · QATAR 2022 ARCHIVE

The goalkeepers who changed Qatar 2022’s penalty shoot-outs

Livaković, Bounou and Martínez helped decide knockout ties. Revisit their saves, and why a missed penalty should not always be recorded as a save.

Education City Stadium during Portugal v South Korea, 2 December 2022.

Education City Stadium during Portugal v South Korea, 2 December 2022.

Photo: Mohammed Sardar / Kushared · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Cropped responsively for display.

A penalty shoot-out compresses a World Cup tie into a sequence of isolated actions. After two hours of movement, the camera can hold a goalkeeper, a taker and a ball. The result is easy to summarise. Explaining how it arrived requires a little more care.

Qatar 2022 gave Dominik Livaković, Yassine Bounou and Emiliano Martínez prominent roles in that sequence. Their interventions helped Croatia, Morocco and Argentina progress. Looking at the shoot-outs individually also reveals a basic distinction that short summaries sometimes lose: a goalkeeper's save and an opponent's miss are not the same event.

Livaković against Japan: three saves

Japan and Croatia finished level at 1–1 after extra time in the round of 16 on 5 December. Livaković saved three of Japan's four shoot-out attempts, and Croatia won the shoot-out 3–1.

The number matters because it describes actual interventions, not simply unsuccessful kicks. Croatia's goalkeeper repeatedly prevented the ball entering the goal. Those saves are a more precise explanation of his contribution than a general statement that Japan lost their nerve.

That psychological description is tempting because the occasion is so exposed. It is also difficult to establish from the outcome alone. The record gives us something firmer to work with: the kicks faced, the saves made and the final shoot-out score.

Bounou against Spain: a post and two saves

A day later, Morocco and Spain reached penalties after a goalless round-of-16 tie. Pablo Sarabia struck the post; Bounou then saved from Carlos Soler and Sergio Busquets. Morocco won the shoot-out 3–0.

Calling all three Spanish attempts saves would inflate Bounou's recorded contribution. Calling the sequence only three misses would hide the actions he did make. Both errors blur the same event in different directions.

Achraf Hakimi's deciding conversion remains part of the story too. Goalkeepers can create the opportunity to win a shoot-out, but their teammates still have to turn their own kicks into goals. Morocco's result required work at both ends of the sequence.

Croatia against Brazil: another different pattern

The quarter-final between Croatia and Brazil finished 1–1 after extra time on 9 December. Livaković saved Rodrygo's attempt in the shoot-out. Marquinhos later hit the post, and Croatia advanced with a 4–2 shoot-out victory.

The comparison with the Japan match is revealing. Croatia won both shoot-outs, but the goalkeeper did not need to make the same number of saves in each. A headline about another penalty victory is accurate; the underlying sequence explains why it happened.

It is also a reminder that a shoot-out score is not a measure of everything a goalkeeper did during the preceding match. The last few minutes can dominate the memory without replacing the rest of the performance.

Martínez against the Netherlands and France

Martínez saved from Virgil van Dijk and Steven Berghuis in Argentina's quarter-final shoot-out against the Netherlands. Argentina advanced 4–3 after the match had finished 2–2.

In the final against France, he saved Kingsley Coman's kick; Aurélien Tchouaméni then missed. Argentina converted all four of their attempts to win the shoot-out 4–2 after a 3–3 draw.

The two sequences gave Martínez a direct role in Argentina's progress and their title. They should still be recorded separately. Different opponents and different kicks produced the same broad outcome: Argentina survived a level match and went through on penalties.

How to read a shoot-out record

Keep three records distinct: the score after playing time, the shoot-out score and the outcome of each kick. This makes it possible to credit a save without inventing one, and to describe progression without adding shoot-out conversions to a player's tournament goal total.

A replay can show more than the outcome, but it does not give access to a player's thoughts. Our interpretation stays with observable actions and the verified record. At Qatar 2022, that is already enough to give these goalkeepers a substantial place in the story.

The cover is an archive photograph of Education City Stadium, which hosted Morocco–Spain and Croatia–Brazil. Its caption identifies the different match shown in the image.

Advertising spaceADVERTISEMENT
FROM THE ARCHIVE

More stories to explore